InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 210
Posts 17160
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/02/2014

Re: surfkast post# 170410

Wednesday, 03/27/2024 4:38:07 PM

Wednesday, March 27, 2024 4:38:07 PM

Post# of 171339
I always that that "Investment Philosophy" was crap (as seen in a traders profile):

I never bash another stock. That's somebody's food on the table. A lot of theories of why this is done, but definitely the person is an a-hole.


Strangely, that trader (along with a few others) hasn't posted here since February 6. I wonder why. And his "X" bio says:

Stocks I talk about only my opinion & entertainment. Never buy a stock I talk about. Do your own due diligence. If you bash a stock I'm in, I'll block you


Oddly, again, he hasn't written a single post on "X" (that I can see) since March 14. I wonder why. But, anyhow, I'll bet some of his followers wished they read that bio more closely. "Never buy a stock I talk about" as he's talked about GVSI a lot. Well, up until March 14 that is. And then there's this also: "If you bash a stock I'm in, I'll block you". Why? What if something negative (a bash) is the TRUTH?? He would censor the TRUTH? Reminds me of this:



But the thing is this. That trader, as well as others, seem to not want the TRUTH to be known sometimes. Indeed, if you tell the TRUTH but it's a "bash" you're an "a-hole" and according to another trader "bashers are way more harmful" than pumpers. I guess that kinda proves the adage "The truth hurts" sometimes. LIke if you're ashareholder and there's BAD NEWS! NO wonder some always try to downplay it or censor it. Hell, how many times have some pumper BULLIES tried to get some to stop posting here?!! (Where'd they go btw?)

Now here's the thing, with the guy above calling bashers "a-holes" and another calling them "zero share basher clowns", I wonder if either of them two (or anyone else for that matter) has ever contacted George Sharp and called him an "a-hole" and/or that, he also, is "harmful" and a "zero share basher clown" for all the bashing he does? And enough so as to have his own "ShitList" of tickers/CEOs. If not, why not? But maybe GS gets a pass for bashing and only GS "tells the turth" while bashing all those tickers/CEOs he might not have any shares of. And what does GS get out of it? Does GS "get paid" for bashing as some think other bashers do? But I get it. Theses geniuses simply don't want to call out their own CEO for bashing. But, anyhow, it certainly appears to me that these ridiculing geniuses can call others an "a-hole" and/or a "zero share basher clown" but not GS for doing the same thing. Oh, maybe they just aren't bright enough to have realized GS bashes?

Anyhow, imo, on the one hand you have the most-beloved PUMPERS (and their endless supply of HYPEIUM, HOPIUM and FOMO-inducing posts) who actually ENCOURAGE people to start putting food on the table (or adding MORE food to the table) and, on the other hand, you have the "zero share basher clowns" who actually WARN people (and often armed with the knowledge of a company's FUNDAMENTALS which pumpers might not know or care about) that it might not be a good idea to put or add food to the table at all because you might regret doing so. That, simply put, is the difference between the two afaic. Oh, and GS seems to be firmly in the latter camp, imo.

And this STILL doesn't seem to sink in to some of the more thick-headed ones:

Gotta be a man of my word and admit that the Bashers were right all along. High risk/High Reward and the longs lose here it appears. Good luck to all.[February 6, 2024]


Apparently some still don't get it.

And then there are all these tickers.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=167347477

Can you imagine the grief bashers probably took warning others about them also?

GLTA

AND THEN MANY FLOCKED TO IHUB!!

My posts are just MY OPINION(S) AND MUSINGS at the time of posting them and are subject to change!! GLTA!!